Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Benjamin Vitter vs Taym Alazmeh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vitter vs Alazmeh analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Vitter vs Taym Alazmeh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vitter 1 - 0 Alazmeh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vitter has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Alazmeh has won 43.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vitter, in recent form, has won 56.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alazmeh has won 54.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.18% and 27.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vitter has saved 63.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alazmeh has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vitter has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Alazmeh winning 46.88% (W/L 15/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vitter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4). Alazmeh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 17/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Vitter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Alazmeh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vitter winning 1 times and Alazmeh being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Vitter winning 2 and Alazmeh winning 1. The last match between Vitter and Alazmeh was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 22-10-2023, Q1 round, Carpet with Benjamin Vitter getting the victory 6-3 3-6 12-10.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vitter and Alazmeh have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vitter winning 1 times and Alazmeh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vitter winning 0, and Alazmeh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vitter has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Alazmeh has played against players with an average rank of 9.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vitter has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alazmeh has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vitter has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alazmeh has converted 35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
58% (7-5)
Career Total W/L
47% (36-40)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Benjamin Vitter vs Taym Alazmeh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vitter VS Alazmeh
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Benjamin Vitter | Taym Alazmeh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (47/78) | 65% (44/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (31/47) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (18/31) | 58% (14/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (23/68) | 37% (29/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 12-10 |
Stats 
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Taym Alazmeh
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Benjamin Vitter | Taym Alazmeh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 25% (2/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (61/60) | 39% (26/41) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.61 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (231/357) | 63% (143/228) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (150/231) | 62% (88/143) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (54/126) | 44% (37/85) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (18/54) | 35% (7/20) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (147/351) | 37% (79/211) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Benjamin Vitter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Benjamin Vitter
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Raphael Calzi
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Panaras
Player
Benjamin Vitter
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Romain Vial
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Benjamin Vitter
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Matt Ponchet
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Taym Alazmeh
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Benjamin Vitter
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Nicolas Colne
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(1) 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Taym Alazmeh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Taym Alazmeh
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Taym Alazmeh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Taym Alazmeh
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taym Alazmeh
Player
Kousuke Ogura
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arda Azkara
Player
Taym Alazmeh
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taym Alazmeh
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Taym Alazmeh
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Taym Alazmeh
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Vitter Vs Alazmeh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vitter are available here and Alazmeh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
